In a surprising turn, the man who built America's nuclear industry later developed a "doomerous" perspective. Citing cost overruns and societal risks, Rickover advised President Jimmy Carter against further commitments to nuclear power, demonstrating a complex and critical view of his own legacy.
When the Navy admiralty tried to force him into retirement, Rickover leveraged his strong, informal relationships with the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy. His candor, a liability within the Navy, became an asset with civilian politicians who ultimately forced his promotion.
Rickover's ability to navigate bureaucracy and win political support was founded on two decades of quiet, heads-down work as an engineering officer. This built a deep reputation for technical excellence that became the bedrock of his later power and influence.
Rickover’s vision extended beyond just building a submarine; he created an entire ecosystem. He founded the first nuclear engineering university programs and forced private industry, like Westinghouse, to create entirely new supply chains for materials like zirconium from scratch.
Rickover purposefully distinguished between engineers and scientists, showing disdain for the latter's theoretical focus. He prioritized building practical, reliable systems—like choosing a simple water-cooled reactor—over more advanced but unproven designs, enabling him to deliver the nuclear submarine years ahead of schedule.
The 40-year plateau in nuclear power wasn't driven by public fear after incidents like Chernobyl, but by the soaring costs of building massive, one-off reactors. The modern push for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) aims to solve this fundamental economic problem through factory-based production.
Rickover created a unique dual reporting structure for his Naval Reactors program, placing it within both the Navy and the civilian Atomic Energy Commission. This allowed him to play the two bureaucracies against each other and consolidate control over all things nuclear.
Utilities are unwilling to fund new nuclear plants due to the high risk of budget overruns. The predicted 'renaissance' will only happen if the government steps in to backstop these projects, absorbing the excess financial risk to incentivize construction and ensure energy security.
An initially moderate pessimistic stance on new technology often escalates into advocacy for draconian policies. The 1970s ban on civilian nuclear power is a prime example of a fear-based decision that created catastrophic long-term consequences, including strengthening geopolitical rivals.
Rickover masterfully created a talent pipeline by using military projects to de-risk civilian ones. Engineers for the first civilian plant at Shippingport trained on his naval reactors. That plant then became the de facto university for the global civilian nuclear workforce.
Rickover's legendary focus on safety was deeply political. He understood that any accident would erode public trust and threaten congressional funding for his entire nuclear program. He managed the technology's public perception as carefully as he managed the reactors.