Dumping raw investigative files, like the Epstein documents, for public interpretation undermines law enforcement's credibility. The proper output of an investigation should be indictments, not media fodder. This approach turns serious crimes into partisan spectacles, ultimately benefiting the perpetrators by diluting the focus on criminal liability.

The Trump administration intentionally releases multiple major, controversial news stories at once. This overwhelms the media and public's attention, preventing deep scrutiny of any single event and effectively neutralizing potentially damaging stories before they gain traction.

A massive information dump like the Epstein files doesn't lead to a unified truth. Instead, it causes society to fragment into dozens of competing narratives, with individuals choosing the version that best aligns with their pre-existing beliefs, deepening polarization.

When authorities like the DOJ cease releasing information on the Epstein case, they create a vacuum. This void is immediately filled by the public, who use available tools to build timelines, identify missing pieces, and generate theories, eroding trust further.

The mass release of Epstein documents, without a trusted institution to filter them, creates a justice problem. Trivial details (like being on an invite list) are over-punished through public shaming, while truly criminal behavior gets lost in the noise, leading to a "mushed together" outcome.

The Department of Justice's strategy for the Epstein files mimics a Russian GRU propaganda technique: overwhelming the public with a mix of true and false information. This creates mass confusion, dilutes the impact of serious allegations, and ultimately leads to public fatigue, protecting powerful individuals from accountability.

Releasing 3 million documents simultaneously, combined with fabricated files circulating on social media, creates an environment where discerning fact from fiction is nearly impossible. This information overload serves as a modern form of obfuscation, hiding truth in plain sight.

The proper role of the Department of Justice is to secure indictments against criminals, not to release unvetted files for public consumption. This approach turns a criminal justice matter into public gossip, ruining careers of the tangentially involved and distracting from the primary goal of prosecuting and imprisoning child rapists.

When direct information is unavailable, as with the Epstein files, the most telling data is the administration's reaction. Their panic, stonewalling, and attempts to discredit the files reveal their perceived explosive nature. This method of "reading the space around the elephant" is a powerful analytical tool.