After the 2008 crisis, 95% of new hedge fund allocations went to firms with over $5B AUM. This made organic growth for smaller managers nearly impossible. Acquiring other GPs became the only viable strategy to achieve necessary scale, track records, and LP relationships.

Related Insights

The private markets industry is bifurcating. General Partners (GPs) must either scale massively with broad distribution to sell multiple products, or focus on a highly differentiated, unique strategy. The middle ground—being a mid-sized, undifferentiated firm—is becoming the most difficult position to defend.

The primary growth drivers for private equity—sovereign wealth and private wealth channels—prefer concentrating capital in large, brand-name firms. This capital shift starves middle-market players of new funds, leading to a likely industry contraction where many may have unknowingly raised their last fund.

Asset managers with $500 billion to $2 trillion in assets are particularly vulnerable to consolidation. They are often too complex to be nimble yet lack the massive scale of top-tier firms, making them prime M&A candidates to bolster capabilities and generate cost efficiencies in a competitive landscape.

The private equity market is following the hedge fund industry's maturation curve. Just as hedge funds saw a consolidation around large platforms and niche specialists, a "shakeout" is coming for undifferentiated, mid-market private equity firms that lack a unique edge or sufficient scale.

Top-tier VC firms like Andreessen Horowitz are evolving beyond traditional venture investing. They are mirroring the playbook of private equity giants like Blackstone by acquiring other asset managers, expanding into new verticals like wealth management, and preparing to go public, prioritizing AUM growth.

LPs are concentrating capital into a few trusted mega-firms, leading to oversubscribed rounds for top players. Simultaneously, a decline in deal formation and liquidity is causing a potential 30-50% "extinction rate" for smaller, emerging managers who are unable to raise subsequent funds.

A major driver for M&A is the increasing scarcity of growth opportunities. Asset owners and intermediaries are actively consolidating providers, planning to reduce the number of asset managers they work with by up to a third, forcing firms to merge to secure their place and access growth.

Contrary to the industry's focus on capital raising, Apollo identifies the generation of high-quality investment opportunities ('origination') as the primary bottleneck to its growth. This mindset shifts their focus from fundraising to building and acquiring platforms that can source unique deals at scale.

Deal-making is evolving beyond same-sector acquisitions. A key trend is "intersector" consolidation, where asset managers acquire wealth or insurance firms. This strategic move aims to control a larger portion of the value chain, bringing the asset manager closer to the end client.

The venture capital landscape is bifurcating. Large, multi-stage funds leverage scale and network, while small, boutique funds win with deep domain expertise. Mid-sized generalist funds lack a clear competitive edge and risk getting squeezed out by these two dominant models.

Post-Crisis Capital Concentration Forced Smaller Asset Managers to Grow via Acquisition | RiffOn